Go After Al Franken? How About Clarence Thomas?

19 Nov

Al Franken is a far better Senator than he ever was a comedian. The guy’s humor was always a bit on the juvenile side, and really just not that funny.

Do I believe that Franken could have done what he is accused of? Yeah, I think the majority of men are capable of being over-aggressive short of violence. I think the majority of men have made an unwanted advance. The difference between the majority and guys like Moore and the Chumph is simply this – they suffer that guilt thing or shame and change their behavior accordingly. Doing something stupid is bad…But it takes a bad person to repeat that behavior over and over.

Now, I am suspicious about the accusation against Franken for two reasons. The accusers association with Hannity on Faux News, and that unlike many of the guys accused of doing this – there aren’t multiple accusers coming out of the woodwork demonstrating a pattern of bad behavior.

Some differences between Franken and the current prdophile/sexial molesters –

Al Franken has been accused by one woman. Roy Moore has been accused by 8,  Donald Trump by 16 (not counting the underage women). The others are serial molesters.

There is the appearance of a political association with a morally bankrupt and racist outfit, which itself has seen almost it’s entire to leadership resign or be fired for sexual predation. Hard to believe the accuser, an attractive woman – never got hit on walking down the hallways of Fox News, when it seems every other woman working in their studios did.

As far as accusations go so far, Mr Franken is accused of molesting an adult woman. Roy Moore molested children, a quite different and serious crime. Trump has been accused by a growing legion of women, similar to Bill Cosby – and was sued by at least one underage woman.

Should Al go down? Well that is a question for his fellow Senators, the Republican portion of which have political reasons to make that happen. Franken’s destruction of Jefferson Davis Sessions has been a thing of beauty.

And if we pursue the path of taking down a Franken, what happens?

Well..There is the case of Clarence Thomas, which needs to be re-examined.

Image result for clarence thomas anita hill

As We Rethink Old Harassers, Let’s Talk About Clarence Thomas

The old men of the Senate lectured Anita Hill from the dais, scowling as she recounted in humiliating detail how Thomas taunted her with graphic tales of pubic hair and Coke cans.

Long suppressed talk about the sexual predation of men, in Hollywood, politics, business, the news industry, professional sports and life in general has swept across the country, exposing decades of dirty laundry and putting an entire nation of men on notice and on edge.

“The discussion” in which the nation is engaged almost daily at this point, has exposed the rank hypocrisy of a right-wing “Christianity” that would sooner see a child molester stalking the well of the United States Senate than free its captive base to support a Democrat, and which still stands foursquare behind braggadocious predator-in-chief Donald Trump.

It has put on display the Republican Party’s radical lack of moral conviction as its leaders rush to condemn the gross, decade-old antics of now Sen. Al Franken, who has at least apologized for his past misbehavior, while they smirk from behind the cameras at Fox News where they are surrounded by anchor women in the required uniform of tight sweaters, mini-skirts, and four-inch heels. Among the Republicans ripping Franken for kissing a woman without her consent and snapping a juvenile “groping” picture in 2006: the great hypocrite Trump himself, of the “I just kiss beautiful women and grab ’em by the pussy” un-humble brag of 2005.

The national moment of self-reflection on the culture that produces such entitled men has compelled the left to indulge in its favorite ritual: curling into the fetal position as it self-flagellates over the eternal sins of the Clintons. It’s as if they’ve forgotten that the former president who left office 17 years ago indeed paid a price, including years of forensic investigation culminating in impeachment for his illicit affair with a 24-year-old White House intern.

Well if we are getting about the business of re-examining the past indecency of powerful men, we’d be remiss not to include the moment in 1991 when a woman was not believed and her alleged abuser was elevated to the highest court in the land, where he remains 26 years later.

The late Andrew Breitbart, who took down Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner by having his minions troll Weiner’s Twitter account in search of his vices, and having found them, waved the lurid visual evidence before the world, once said he was inspired to become a conservative because of Clarence Thomas, whom he viewed as a persecuted man. Breitbart cloaked his savage politics in alleged concern for a beleaguered black man, saying of Thomas’ critics: “[t]hese white, privileged men knew that by taking this conservative, religious man and asking him if he rented pornography, the mere exposure of that would hurt… I was so pissed off. You guys are just trying to ruin him. You don’t have anything.”

Not anything, that is, except the word of Anita Hill, an African-American woman who risked national humiliation and ruin to publicly tell her story of repeated sexual harassment at the hands of Thomas, her onetime boss at the U.S. Department of Education and the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission.

It’s hard to see Thomas, who wrote off his Yale degree as worthless because of affirmative action yet retreated to the language of “lynching” to disparage his accuser and her supporters, as much of a victim. Particularly when most Americans, and most African Americans, took his side against Anita Hill and against prominent civil rights and women’s rights organizations who were unanimous in their opposition to his elevation to the seat once occupied by the great Thurgood Marshall. Democrats including then-Sen. Joe Biden, took Thomas’ side against Hill, too—even refusing to allow witnesses who could corroborate her account to testify at Thomas’ Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

Instead, we were treated to a bipartisan spectacle of the old men of the United States Senate lecturing Professor Hill from the dais; scowling at her as she was forced to recount in mortifying detail how Thomas pushed her to date him and taunted her with disgusting jokes and insinuations at work that included graphic tales of pubic hair and Coke cans.

Again, most Americans chose not to believe Hill, who was castigated as a liar, a temptress, and a race-traitor trying to keep a black man off the Supreme Court. Never mind that the American Bar Association had delivered a mixed verdict on whether he was even qualified for a lifetime appointment of such grandeur. I can personally recall knock-down, drag out arguments with black colleagues and relatives who were defending Thomas, and demanding a West Indian gypsy cab driver in the Bronx pull over and let me out of his car after he called Hill a whore.

Having been placed on the court anyway, Thomas became the silent justice; voting in lockstep with the late Antonin Scalia and authoring precious little worth remembering for posterity save for his serial attacks on labor rights, women’s rights and the voting rights of fellow African Americans. Needless to say, many black men and women who sided with Thomas against Anita Hill soon came to bitterly regret it.

When Weiner’s political career went up in flames, he was in the midst of exposing Justice Thomas with regular rants on the House floor for his ostentatious habit of consorting with major Republican donors who might have business before his court, often with Scalia at his side.

Thomas’ chummy ways with the rich and well-heeled, and his wife’s clear conflicts of interest as a paid crusader against Obamacare despite it coming imminently before the court, presaged the age of corruption we find ourselves in today, with Donald Trump and his extended family of kakistocrats blundering their way around Washington and the world’s capitols in search of grubby gain. In many ways, the banality with which Americans dismissed Thomas’ alleged sexual misconduct, his disparagement of his victim, and his ethical flexibility were a portent of the Trump era to come.

And like Trump, and unlike Bill Clinton, Thomas sits in power still; with the authority to make life and death decisions over the fate of those facing capital punishment, those needing health care, and most ironically, over the rights and liberties of women.

As happened with Trump, Thomas’ elevation despite the shocking allegations against him ignited women to action. In 1992, a record number of women ran for federal office, increasing the number of female United States senators from just two to six, prompting the media to declare it “the year of the woman.” Among those newly elected senators was Barbara Boxer, who as a House member had helped lead a march with six of her female colleagues to the Senate to demand that Hill’s allegations against Thomas be taken seriously and that his confirmation be delayed.

Ironically, the wave of elected women, including the first black woman senator, Carole Mosely Braun, in 1992 helped carry Bill Clinton, himself accused of sexual indiscretions and misconduct as governor of Arkansas, into the White House. When Bill Bennett and the self-righteous, self-appointed “moral majority” in the conservative movement announced the “death of outrage” after Clinton failed to be taken down by his affair with Monica Lewinsky, they perhaps forgot that outrage died first with the shaming and dismissal of Anita Hill.

Or maybe they didn’t forget because they never really cared. Who, after all, was Anita Hill to them but some black woman trying to keep a “good, conservative Christian” off the high court. It’s an echo of today’s advent of rank hypocrisy, when Roy Moore’s accusers are accused of trying to keep a “good, conservative Christian” out of the Senate. Or when the right wing furrows its collective brow at the predatory men of Hollywood—discarded by Democrats without a second thought—while they vow to die on the desiccated moral hill of Donald J. Trump.

Indeed, we need to continue to talk about predacious men. That needs to include the sexual raptors armed with immense power right now—beginning with the president of the United States and the high court’s scandalized associate justice, Clarence Thomas.




Tags: , , , , , , , ,

8 responses to “Go After Al Franken? How About Clarence Thomas?

  1. CNu

    November 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM

    Draining the CBC swamp of old lizards that death can’t move fast enough to take


    • btx3

      November 21, 2017 at 10:15 AM

      Charlie Rose isn’t part of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC).

      And then there is the Sexual Molester in Chief.


      • CNu

        November 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM

        lol, the link is to a comment at my spot aggregated under the Rose pankpocalypse post. The commenter is calling out John Conyers musty 88 year old monkey-azz.


      • btx3

        November 21, 2017 at 11:18 AM

        Dude – I worked on the Hill for several years, in one of my early hobs repairing Data Recording and computer equipment as a Field Engineer. The group I managed also installed the first ethernet LAN east of the Mississippi in existence in the Capitol building to support printing of he Congressional Record…

        A job which required routing coax through and around certain sex hideaways which aren’t on the “official” blueprint of the Capitol building. I also got to visit most of the Congressional Offices both in the Office Buildings and in the “Siberia” of the Old FBI Building, and meet/see their staff. You see, what they did back in the day was hide people like Barney Frank’s all gay male back office staff over in the FBI Building. The press, politely, looked the other way.

        I have met and dated several of the rather attractive Congressional staff ladies. They are often there for the combination of their smarts…And looks.

        As to Conyers and your crusade against black political figures in general…I could give a fuck.If I were to have the choice of hanging every Congressman who had overstayed his welcome or mental faculties on the Hill – Conyers would well be on the list…But there would be a whole bunch of those young and old assed, white Republican racist motherfuckers you appear to worship right beside him.


      • CNu

        November 21, 2017 at 11:38 AM

        I don’t appear to worship any one or any thing – even the simpleminded can recognize the anarchistic gist of my schadenfreude. Every single slimy and specious attack you parasites have leveled at .45 has bounced back on you – and you still can’t figure out how to adjust your strategy or tactics to deal with his unprecedented threat.

        To me, that’s nothing less than the writing on your collective wall – telling you it’s overdue time to pack it in and go home for good…,


      • btx3

        November 21, 2017 at 12:04 PM

        You seem to be easily fooled by electoral chicanery instead of understanding the fact the Chumphshit lost the popular vote by 6 million votes.

        You also are fooled by the situation that Mueller hasn’t hung his racist ass yet.

        At some point, real soon…Folks are going to get tired of waiting for a “legal” solution.

        Even half of the voters who supported the Chumphshit in 2016 have now changed sides.

        I can only hope the legal effort to remove the Chumphshit beats the need of the population’s non-legal methodology.


      • CNu

        November 21, 2017 at 12:42 PM

        rotflmbao…, it’s 3 million popular votes, not 6 million.

        But assuming we’re in an alternate universe where these 3 million puerto rican votes magically count, the constitutional changeover from a republic to a popular democracy is not going to happen. Setting aside for a moment that intractable political fact, 3 million parasite votes don’t matter because puerto rico doesn’t produce anything but more puerto ricans.

        At some point, real soon…Folks are going to get tired of waiting for a “legal” solution.

        sigh…, back to that old saw…,

        He’s not going to be indicted.

        He’s not going to be impeached.

        None of the limp-wristed gamma-males comprising the Cathedral and its intersectional allies is going to harm a hair on his badly pompadoured head.

        Every single thing you haters, fools, and still-stunned bad losers do is only going to redound back on you. But by all means, please carry on. The havoc you’re wreaking on your own tattered institutions and reputations is priceless comedy gold from out here in the heart of fly-over where I sit.


      • btx3

        November 21, 2017 at 1:31 PM

        Yeah…After removing 3 million black voters it was “only” 3 million.

        Now one of us is going to look like a fool. So, you want to put a wager on that?

        My favorite cheap Scotch at the moment is “The Yamazaki Single Malt Whisky – Distiller’s Reserve Single Malt Whisky” available for about $60 a bottle.

        Of course, if you are especially repentant upon losing – feel free on your own repentance to send the 12 year.

        What would you like in the rather miniscule chance that you win at the same $60 level?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: