RSS

Hairspray Addiction and Maxine Waters

02 Dec

Listen to the first 50 seconds of this one, and the only conclusion you came come up with…

Is this woman is on drugs.

WTF is with the “young articulate” bullsquat?

 
16 Comments

Posted by on December 2, 2009 in The Post-Racial Life

 

Tags: , , ,

16 responses to “Hairspray Addiction and Maxine Waters

  1. makheru bradley

    December 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM

    The sister opposes Obama’s nonsensical “finish the job” rationale. Sounds completely coherent to me.

    Barack Obama is the one on drugs—addicted to war, like his predecessor.

    Like

     
    • btx3

      December 2, 2009 at 7:34 PM

      I disagree Makheru. I think Obama got stuck with this war, and based on the border proximity with Pakistan which is a nuclear power – there just isn’t any choice.

      Like

       
      • brotherbrown

        December 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM

        So you believe the US can control all world events?

        Like

         
      • btx3

        December 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM

        No. But what I do believe is that it is within our power to solve a limited set of problems.

        Like

         
      • brotherbrown

        December 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM

        So as it pertains to Afghanistan and it’s proximity to Pakistan and Iran, what are the limited set of problems a troop surge will solve?

        Like

         
      • btx3

        December 4, 2009 at 12:13 AM

        Mostly the issue is to support Pakistan by eliminating, or severely crippling the Taliban. It doesn’t do anything relative to Iran. If the Taliban is left to run Afghanistan and to promote their version of Islamic Insanity into Pakistan – probably forcing a Civil War…

        Then we have a nuclear war to deal with. India is not going to tolerate that sort of insanity on their border, armed with nuclear missiles – nor is Israel going to tolerate a radical Islamic power with nuclear weapons.

        That is really what Afghanistan was all about from the beginning – and why the Bushit and the Dick screwed things up so badly by not letting our troops finish the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

        Like

         
      • brotherbrown

        December 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM

        That is not a “limited set of problems” and smells like quagmire.

        Like

         
      • btx3

        December 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM

        Compared to “Steal the oil” – Yeah, it is.

        Like

         
      • brotherbrown

        December 5, 2009 at 12:15 AM

        Sorry, I see I have to click reply off the last comment.

        Serious question, unless you kill all the men and boys above age 7, how do you think you could actually elimate the Taliban and Al Qaeda?

        Like

         
      • t-shirts101

        December 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM

        Eliminate? Never. Control or diminish, maybe.

        The Taliban and Al Queda existed before Obama or Bush, and were ineffective (comparible to 9/11 and previous embassy and millitary assults). The best that can be done is to make their existance difficult.

        Like

         
      • brotherbrown

        December 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM

        See, if they’ll never really die, and you want to make their existence difficult, you are talking about a permanent presence.

        I’d like to hear Obama cut through all the BS and just say that if that is the truth. The dual wars were Bush’s Kobiashi Maru, and he failed the test of character. Is it also Obama’s, and will he pass the test?

        Like

         
      • btx3

        December 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM

        I think we are basically out of Iraq. The biggest danger in the region isn’t Iran – it is a radicalized Pakistan.

        My belief is that the Taliban may have overplayed their hand in Pakistan.

        And no – you can’t kill an idea…

        But you sure can come up with a better one – which in this case is something the locals have to do – not us – as the Bushit tried.

        Like

         
      • btx3

        December 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM

        The Taliban came out of one of the regional warlord groups as part of the radical Wahabi movement of the past 30 years. Big distinction between them and the typical conservative Islam practiced in these areas. WE can’t eliminate them…

        But the locals can.

        Like

         
  2. brotherbrown

    December 3, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    So as it pertains to Afghanistan and it’s proximity to Pakistan and Iran, what are the limited set of problems a troop surge will solve?

    Like

     
  3. brotherbrown

    December 5, 2009 at 12:13 AM

    Serious question, unless you kill all the men and boys above age 7, how do you think you could actually elimate the Taliban and Al Qaeda?

    Like

     
    • btx3

      December 5, 2009 at 11:38 AM

      We made the Taliban – just as we manufactured Al Qaeda to fight the Soviet threat in the 70’s.

      We are not going to eliminate the sort of old-style traditional Islam that is practiced in Afghanistan. But it is important to remember, the Taliban is a perversion of that – even to the Afghani people.

      We can make the Taliban weak enough, regional and local forces can wipe the out.

      Like

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: