What’s Really “Indefensible”

28 Sep
Representative Arthur Davis

Representative Arthur Davis

Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.), an often contrarian member of the Congressional Black Caucus, on Sunday called proposed penalties against small business that do not provide their workers health insurance, “indefensible.”

The congressman addressed insurance mandates that would levy fines against small businesses of 25 or more employees that do not provide health insurance or would require a business to offer health coverage based on the size of its payroll.

“Frankly, the House leadership seems wedded to keeping that in,” Davis told the Montgomery (Ala.) Advertiser. “And the more you look at it, the more indefensible that is.”

Davis has long been critical of current health reform proposals, a stance that makes him an outlier in the CBC, which overwhelmingly support reform.

The fourth-term Democrat also criticized the public health insurance option, a top CBC priority, as unworkable.

“Public option can’t pass the Senate…I’m interested in something that can pass and Barack Obama can sign,” Davis said.

Davis was an early backer of President Barack Obama in last year’s election, serving as Alabama state campaign chairman. The lawmaker is running for governor of Alabama, a state GOP nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) won handily in 2008.

Not sure I agree with Mr. Davis on a number of points. First, it seems to me it would be a lot more productive to develop a Health Care Reform which has a Plan which is actually affordable for Small Business.

Mayhaps a “Davis Amendment” to the current Health Care Bill?

Otherwise Mr. Davis is just pissing into the wind, and not doing anything constructive.

Good Luck to Mr. Davis on his run for Governor of Alabama. One would hope Mr. Davis does not feel the need to become a Republican in Democrat clothing to sway the white voters, especially after the untrammeled record of Republicans in leading the state to being at the ass end of damn near everything.

I think the folks of Alabama deserve better than that.

1 Comment

Posted by on September 28, 2009 in Stupid Democrat Tricks


Tags: , , , , ,

One response to “What’s Really “Indefensible”

  1. brotherbrown

    September 28, 2009 at 11:36 PM

    It’s a good point BT, and is the reason I am so bored with politics and politicians. It’s such a copout to criticize without even a flicker of an idea to move the discussion forward. I’ve never heard the full explanation for why health insurance can’t be like auto insurance, where you can get care wherever you are when you get sick without fear of being denied coverage. But there has to be a way for small business to buy group insurance at an affordable rate.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: